The Legend of Potemkin Village
The legend of the Potemkin village has survived for centuries not because of its historical accuracy, but because of its irresistible symbolism.
Grigory Potemkin, eager to impress Empress Catherine the Great during her tour of Crimea, allegedly constructed entire fake villages—freshly painted facades, staged crowds, overflowing storehouses—that shimmered with prosperity from afar but dissolved into emptiness on closer inspection.
Whether the tale is myth or truth hardly matters.What matters is the metaphor: the beautifully crafted illusion designed to mask a far less glamorous reality.
And in the 21st century, nothing fits this metaphor more perfectly than the world of artificial intelligence.
The Rise of Potemkin AI
Today’s Potemkin villages aren’t made of painted wood.
They are made of algorithms, marketing decks, conference demos, and breathless promises about “fully autonomous” systems.
Potemkin AI is any technology presented as seamless, automatic, and intelligent—while quietly relying on a vast, unseen workforce of humans performing the actual cognitive labor.
People who label data, classify images, correct errors, moderate content, or—in the most extreme cases—manually operate the system behind the scenes.
The façade is automation.
The reality is thousands of human hands in the shadows.
Amazon’s “Just Walk Out”: The Perfect Potemkin Exhibit
When Amazon introduced “Just Walk Out” (JWO) technology for its Fresh grocery stores, it was hailed as a triumph of frictionless retail. A vision of the future where you could skip the checkout line entirely:
- No cashiers
- No self-service kiosks
- No waiting
- Just pick up your groceries and… walk out
Your account would be charged automatically.
Cameras, sensors, and machine learning would handle the rest.
It was sleek. It was futuristic. It was irresistible PR.
But it wasn’t the whole story.
Investigations later revealed that behind the “AI-powered” magic was an enormous human operation. Over a thousand workers in India were tasked with watching the store’s video feeds, labeling actions, and confirming what each customer picked up—sometimes for as many as 70% of transactions.
The world saw an autonomous system.
But the real machinery was a global team of underpaid human reviewers.
In Potemkin’s time, the granaries Catherine inspected were filled with sacks that looked heavy with grain but were actually stuffed with sand.
The comparison writes itself.
JWO wasn’t AI-first with human oversight.
It was human-first with AI branding layered on top.
A Potemkin village of the retail age.
Why Companies Keep Building Potemkin AI
It’s easy to ask: why not just admit that humans are involved?
Why cling to the illusion of full automation?
The answer is simple.
The word “AI” is a multiplier.
AI means higher valuations.
AI attracts investors.
AI generates headlines and wins contracts.
A “computer vision checkout system powered by ML” sounds exponentially sexier—and far more fundable—than “a global labor force reviewing video footage.”
The less glamorous truth is economically inconvenient.
So companies maintain the façade.
They hide the ghost workers—discrete armies of people labeling images, flagging posts, identifying objects, and sometimes even simulating AI outputs manually—because revealing them would puncture the narrative.
And the narrative is everything.
When the Ghost Workers Step Out of the Shadows
But not everyone is willing to stay invisible.
In Kenya, where many of these workers are based, data annotators earning as little as a few dollars per hour have begun organizing to make themselves seen. Their Data Labelers Association represents the very backbone of AI—the people whose repetitive, meticulous labor makes models functional.
Their message is simple:
If AI is the new gold rush, why are the miners still treated as disposable?
They demand:
- fair compensation
- transparency
- mental health protections
- recognition in the AI supply chain
Their movement exposes the central lie of Potemkin AI: not that AI doesn’t work, but that it works because human beings make it work.
Behind every “intelligent system” are thousands of clicks, decisions, and labels performed by real people whose labor rarely appears in the glossy product story.
The Real Risk of Potemkin AI
The danger isn’t just ethical—it’s structural.
By investing in illusions of autonomy, society risks misunderstanding what AI can actually do. Public trust erodes. Policymakers make decisions on false assumptions. Companies overpromise and underdeliver. And genuine innovations—the real, meaningful advances in machine learning—are overshadowed by systems that function only because an invisible workforce props them up.
Potemkin AI dazzles, then disappoints.
It turns the future into a marketing veneer.
And the more we mistake the façade for the technology itself, the further we drift from understanding how AI truly works—and how it should evolve.
.